Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law write by Douglas Walton. This book was released on 2005-06-30. Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Use of argumentation methods applied to legal reasoning is a relatively new field of study. The book provides a survey of the leading problems, and outlines how future research using argumentation-based methods show great promise of leading to useful solutions. The problems studied include not only these of argument evaluation and argument invention, but also analysis of specific kinds of evidence commonly used in law, like witness testimony, circumstantial evidence, forensic evidence and character evidence. New tools for analyzing these kinds of evidence are introduced.
Witness Testimony Evidence
Witness Testimony Evidence - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook Witness Testimony Evidence write by Douglas Walton. This book was released on 2007-11-19. Witness Testimony Evidence available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Recent work in artificial intelligence has increasingly turned to argumentation as a rich, interdisciplinary area of research that can provide new methods related to evidence and reasoning in the area of law. Douglas Walton provides an introduction to basic concepts, tools and methods in argumentation theory and artificial intelligence as applied to the analysis and evaluation of witness testimony. He shows how witness testimony is by its nature inherently fallible and sometimes subject to disastrous failures. At the same time such testimony can provide evidence that is not only necessary but inherently reasonable for logically guiding legal experts to accept or reject a claim. Walton shows how to overcome the traditional disdain for witness testimony as a type of evidence shown by logical positivists, and the views of trial sceptics who doubt that trial rules deal with witness testimony in a way that yields a rational decision-making process.
Legal Argumentation and Evidence
Legal Argumentation and Evidence - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook Legal Argumentation and Evidence write by Douglas Walton. This book was released on 2010-11-01. Legal Argumentation and Evidence available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. A leading expert in informal logic, Douglas Walton turns his attention in this new book to how reasoning operates in trials and other legal contexts, with special emphasis on the law of evidence. The new model he develops, drawing on methods of argumentation theory that are gaining wide acceptance in computing fields like artificial intelligence, can be used to identify, analyze, and evaluate specific types of legal argument. In contrast with approaches that rely on deductive and inductive logic and rule out many common types of argument as fallacious, Walton&’s aim is to provide a more expansive view of what can be considered &"reasonable&" in legal argument when it is construed as a dynamic, rule-governed, and goal-directed conversation. This dialogical model gives new meaning to the key notions of relevance and probative weight, with the latter analyzed in terms of pragmatic criteria for what constitutes plausible evidence rather than truth.
Logical Models of Legal Argumentation
Logical Models of Legal Argumentation - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook Logical Models of Legal Argumentation write by H. Prakken. This book was released on 2012-12-06. Logical Models of Legal Argumentation available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. In the study of forms of legal reasoning, logic and argumentation theory long followed separate tracks. `Legal logicians' tended to focus on a deductive reconstruction of justifying a decision, disregarding the dialectical process leading to the chosen justification. Others instead emphasized the adversarial and discretionary nature of legal reasoning, involving reasonable evaluation of alternative choices, and the use of analogical reasoning. Recently, however, developments in Artificial Intelligence and Law have paved the way for overcoming this separation. Logic has widened its scope to defensible argumentation, and informal accounts of analogy and dialectics have inspired the construction of computer programs. Thus the prospect is emerging of an integrated logical and dialectical account of legal argument, adding to the understanding of legal reasoning, and providing a formal basis for computer tools that assist and mediate legal debates while leaving room for human initiative. This book presents contributions to this development. From a logical point of view it covers topics such as evaluating conflicting arguments, weighing reasons, modelling legal disputes as a dialogue game, the role of the burden of proof, the relation between principles, rules, reasons and facts, and the relation between deductive and nondeductive arguments. Written by leading scholars in the field and building on recent developments in logic and Artificial Intelligence, the chapters provide a state-of-the-art account of research on the logical aspects of legal argument.
Argument Evaluation and Evidence
Argument Evaluation and Evidence - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook Argument Evaluation and Evidence write by Douglas Walton. This book was released on 2015-08-04. Argument Evaluation and Evidence available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. This monograph poses a series of key problems of evidential reasoning and argumentation. It then offers solutions achieved by applying recently developed computational models of argumentation made available in artificial intelligence. Each problem is posed in such a way that the solution is easily understood. The book progresses from confronting these problems and offering solutions to them, building a useful general method for evaluating arguments along the way. It provides a hands-on survey explaining to the reader how to use current argumentation methods and concepts that are increasingly being implemented in more precise ways for the application of software tools in computational argumentation systems. It shows how the use of these tools and methods requires a new approach to the concepts of knowledge and explanation suitable for diverse settings, such as issues of public safety and health, debate, legal argumentation, forensic evidence, science education, and the use of expert opinion evidence in personal and public deliberations.
