Law and Politics in the Supreme Court

Download Law and Politics in the Supreme Court PDF Online Free

Author :
Release : 1964
Genre : Administrative law
Kind :
Book Rating : /5 ( reviews)

Law and Politics in the Supreme Court - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook Law and Politics in the Supreme Court write by Martin M. Shapiro. This book was released on 1964. Law and Politics in the Supreme Court available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle.

In the Balance: Law and Politics on the Roberts Court

Download In the Balance: Law and Politics on the Roberts Court PDF Online Free

Author :
Release : 2013-09-30
Genre : Biography & Autobiography
Kind :
Book Rating : 440/5 ( reviews)

In the Balance: Law and Politics on the Roberts Court - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook In the Balance: Law and Politics on the Roberts Court write by Mark Tushnet. This book was released on 2013-09-30. In the Balance: Law and Politics on the Roberts Court available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Examines the initial years of the Roberts Court, covering the legal philosophies that have informed decisions on such major cases as the Affordable Care Act, the political structures behind appointments, and the struggle for dominance of the Court.

The Constrained Court

Download The Constrained Court PDF Online Free

Author :
Release : 2011-08-22
Genre : Law
Kind :
Book Rating : 260/5 ( reviews)

The Constrained Court - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook The Constrained Court write by Michael A. Bailey. This book was released on 2011-08-22. The Constrained Court available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. How do Supreme Court justices decide their cases? Do they follow their policy preferences? Or are they constrained by the law and by other political actors? The Constrained Court combines new theoretical insights and extensive data analysis to show that law and politics together shape the behavior of justices on the Supreme Court. Michael Bailey and Forrest Maltzman show how two types of constraints have influenced the decision making of the modern Court. First, Bailey and Maltzman document that important legal doctrines, such as respect for precedents, have influenced every justice since 1950. The authors find considerable variation in how these doctrines affect each justice, variation due in part to the differing experiences justices have brought to the bench. Second, Bailey and Maltzman show that justices are constrained by political factors. Justices are not isolated from what happens in the legislative and executive branches, and instead respond in predictable ways to changes in the preferences of Congress and the president. The Constrained Court shatters the myth that justices are unconstrained actors who pursue their personal policy preferences at all costs. By showing how law and politics interact in the construction of American law, this book sheds new light on the unique role that the Supreme Court plays in the constitutional order.

The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics

Download The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics PDF Online Free

Author :
Release : 2021-09-14
Genre : Law
Kind :
Book Rating : 365/5 ( reviews)

The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics write by Stephen Breyer. This book was released on 2021-09-14. The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. A sitting justice reflects upon the authority of the Supreme CourtÑhow that authority was gained and how measures to restructure the Court could undermine both the Court and the constitutional system of checks and balances that depends on it. A growing chorus of officials and commentators argues that the Supreme Court has become too political. On this view the confirmation process is just an exercise in partisan agenda-setting, and the jurists are no more than Òpoliticians in robesÓÑtheir ostensibly neutral judicial philosophies mere camouflage for conservative or liberal convictions. Stephen Breyer, drawing upon his experience as a Supreme Court justice, sounds a cautionary note. Mindful of the CourtÕs history, he suggests that the judiciaryÕs hard-won authority could be marred by reforms premised on the assumption of ideological bias. Having, as Hamilton observed, Òno influence over either the sword or the purse,Ó the Court earned its authority by making decisions that have, over time, increased the publicÕs trust. If public trust is now in decline, one part of the solution is to promote better understandings of how the judiciary actually works: how judges adhere to their oaths and how they try to avoid considerations of politics and popularity. Breyer warns that political intervention could itself further erode public trust. Without the publicÕs trust, the Court would no longer be able to act as a check on the other branches of government or as a guarantor of the rule of law, risking serious harm to our constitutional system.

The Supreme Court and American Political Development

Download The Supreme Court and American Political Development PDF Online Free

Author :
Release : 2006-05-15
Genre : Law
Kind :
Book Rating : 397/5 ( reviews)

The Supreme Court and American Political Development - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook The Supreme Court and American Political Development write by Ronald Kahn. This book was released on 2006-05-15. The Supreme Court and American Political Development available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. This innovative volume explores the evolution of constitutional doctrine as elaborated by the Supreme Court. Moving beyond the traditional "law versus politics" perspective, the authors draw extensively on recent studies in American Political Development (APD) to present a much more complex and sophisticated view of the Court as both a legal and political entity. The contributors--including Pam Brandwein, Howard Gillman, Mark Graber, Ronald Kahn, Tom Keck, Ken Kersch, Wayne Moore, Carol Nackenoff, Julie Novkov, and Mark Tushnet--share an appreciation that the process of constitutional development involves a complex interplay between factors internal and external to the Court. They underscore the developmental nature of the Court, revealing how its decision-making and legal authority evolve in response to a variety of influences: not only laws and legal precedents, but also social and political movements, election returns and regime changes, advocacy group litigation, and the interpretive community of scholars, journalists, and lawyers. Initial chapters reexamine standard approaches to the question of causation in judicial decision-making and the relationship between the Court and the ambient political order. Next, a selection of historical case studies exemplifies how the Court constructs its own authority as it defines individual rights and the powers of government. They show how interpretations of the Reconstruction amendments inform our understanding of racial discrimination, explain the undermining of affirmative action after Bakke, and consider why Roe v. Wade has yet to be overturned. They also tell how the Court has collaborated with political coalitions to produce the New Deal, Great Society, and Reagan Revolution, and why Native Americans have different citizenship rights than other Americans. These contributions encourage further debate about the nature and processes of constitutional change and invite APD scholars to think about law and the Court in more sophisticated ways.