Logical Models of Legal Argumentation - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook Logical Models of Legal Argumentation write by H. Prakken. This book was released on 2012-12-06. Logical Models of Legal Argumentation available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. In the study of forms of legal reasoning, logic and argumentation theory long followed separate tracks. `Legal logicians' tended to focus on a deductive reconstruction of justifying a decision, disregarding the dialectical process leading to the chosen justification. Others instead emphasized the adversarial and discretionary nature of legal reasoning, involving reasonable evaluation of alternative choices, and the use of analogical reasoning. Recently, however, developments in Artificial Intelligence and Law have paved the way for overcoming this separation. Logic has widened its scope to defensible argumentation, and informal accounts of analogy and dialectics have inspired the construction of computer programs. Thus the prospect is emerging of an integrated logical and dialectical account of legal argument, adding to the understanding of legal reasoning, and providing a formal basis for computer tools that assist and mediate legal debates while leaving room for human initiative. This book presents contributions to this development. From a logical point of view it covers topics such as evaluating conflicting arguments, weighing reasons, modelling legal disputes as a dialogue game, the role of the burden of proof, the relation between principles, rules, reasons and facts, and the relation between deductive and nondeductive arguments. Written by leading scholars in the field and building on recent developments in logic and Artificial Intelligence, the chapters provide a state-of-the-art account of research on the logical aspects of legal argument.
Logical Models of Legal Argumentation
Logical Models of Legal Argumentation - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook Logical Models of Legal Argumentation write by Henry Prakken. This book was released on 1996. Logical Models of Legal Argumentation available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle.
Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument
Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument write by H. Prakken. This book was released on 2013-04-17. Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. This book is a revised and extended version of my PhD Thesis 'Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument', which I defended on 14 January 1993 at the Free University Amsterdam. The first five chapters of the thesis have remained almost completely unchanged but the other chapters have undergone considerable revision and expansion. Most importantly, I have replaced the formal argument-based system of the old Chapters 6, 7 and 8 with a revised and extended system, whieh I have developed during the last three years in collaboration with Giovanni Sartor. Apart from some technical improvements, the main additions to the old system are the enriehment of its language with a nonprovability operator, and the ability to formalise reasoning about preference criteria. Moreover, the new system has a very intuitive dialectieal form, as opposed to the rather unintuitive fixed-point appearance of the old system. Another important revision is the split of the old Chapter 9 into two new chapters. The old Section 9. 1 on related research has been updated and expanded into a whole chapter, while the rest of the old chapter is now in revised form in Chapter 10. This chapter also contains two new contributions, a detailed discussion of Gordon's Pleadings Game, and a general description of a multi-Iayered overall view on the structure of argu mentation, comprising a logieal, dialectical, procedural and strategie layer. Finally, in the revised conclusion I have paid more attention to the relevance of my investigations for legal philosophy and argumentation theory.
Legal Argumentation and Evidence
Legal Argumentation and Evidence - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook Legal Argumentation and Evidence write by Douglas Walton. This book was released on 2010-11-01. Legal Argumentation and Evidence available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. A leading expert in informal logic, Douglas Walton turns his attention in this new book to how reasoning operates in trials and other legal contexts, with special emphasis on the law of evidence. The new model he develops, drawing on methods of argumentation theory that are gaining wide acceptance in computing fields like artificial intelligence, can be used to identify, analyze, and evaluate specific types of legal argument. In contrast with approaches that rely on deductive and inductive logic and rule out many common types of argument as fallacious, Walton&’s aim is to provide a more expansive view of what can be considered &"reasonable&" in legal argument when it is construed as a dynamic, rule-governed, and goal-directed conversation. This dialogical model gives new meaning to the key notions of relevance and probative weight, with the latter analyzed in terms of pragmatic criteria for what constitutes plausible evidence rather than truth.
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation - read free eBook in online reader or directly download on the web page. Select files or add your book in reader. Download and read online ebook Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation write by Thomas Bustamante. This book was released on 2015-04-07. Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. This book provides theoretical tools for evaluating the soundness of arguments in the context of legal argumentation. It deals with a number of general argument types and their particular use in legal argumentation. It provides detailed analyses of argument from authority, argument ad hominem, argument from ignorance, slippery slope argument and other general argument types. Each of these argument types can be used to construct arguments that are sound as well as arguments that are unsound. To evaluate an argument correctly one must be able to distinguish the sound instances of a certain argument type from its unsound instances. This book promotes the development of theoretical tools for this task.
